Stiven Hodgkins

Stiven Hodgkins

If the creation of the universe is the same as DG Kenstein says, shouldn't we be a center in the universe?

Think about it: the universe is not in three dimensions, but in four dimensions, and we have three dimensions.

There are no three-dimensional objects, just as there are no flat objects. In physics there is no surface without a body, thinking of surfaces is an abstract (mathematical geographical) concept, because the surface belongs to the body, there is no surface without bodies.

Therefore, there is no immortal body, the idea of ​​an immortal body is exactly the same, like thinking of an airplane, like an airplane is a part of the body, a dimensional body, the size of which is equal to the dynamic (c) velocity. What we call time (relative) is a part of the body in four dimensions.

** From the beginning of the century, physics cannot be explained without four dimensions and who made it or taught it to fools.

The problem is that you think time is one dimension and the time we are talking about is the relative time of each observer, which passes differently, this time the measure we measure. That is the speed of this direction (fourth dimension).

Therefore, we relate the fourth dimension to the dynamics of the wave relative to time and speed.

You cannot describe the ratio of velocity, or time and axis to different observers, nor can you explain the energy or extent of the universe, the highest concentration is the three-dimensional atom Istoria ...

Monthly Information: L.E.U.

You still have to read Maywick to understand that what you are saying is meaningless and baseless.

And if we have another dimension

You have a lot to learn.

Stephen Hawking brings a lot of imagination and little evidence of what he claims, questions things and argues for himself and doesn't make claims without looking at celebrities from their point of view. Do it and you will understand me

Stiven Hodgkins

Stiven Hodgkins

If the creation of the universe is like what DG Kensstein says, shouldn't we have a center in the universe? ^

And based on that, if we make a 3D perimeter based on the fact that the center of the universe is the center of this orbit and the earth is on its edge, isn't it more likely to find life on other planets? ? ? Because they're as old as our planet at the same distance and that's why I want to know if my logic is correct or not and why not.

update

We are basically talking about an aspect that we have not yet explored.

Consider this: the universe has four dimensions instead of three, and it deceives us as it has three.

There are no three-dimensional objects, just as there are no flat objects. In physics there is no surface without a body, thinking of surfaces is an abstract (mathematical geographical) concept, because the surface belongs to the body, there is no surface without bodies.

So there is no body without time, the idea of ​​a body without time is absolutely abstract, like thinking of an airplane, like a plane is a part of the body, a dimensional body, the size of which is equal to the dynamic (c). Speed, which we call time (relative), is a part of the body in four dimensions.

** From the beginning of the century, physics cannot be explained without four dimensions and who made it or taught it to fools.

The problem is that you think time is one dimension and the time we are talking about is the relative time of each viewer, which passes differently, this time the measure we measure. That is the speed of this direction (fourth dimension).

Therefore, we relate the fourth dimension to the dynamics of the wave relative to time and speed.

You can't explain the ratio of speed, or time and axis to different observers, nor can you explain the energy or expansion of the universe, the higher concentration is the three-dimensional atom Istoria ...

More info: L.E.U.

Yet you have to learn to see that what you say has no meaning and no basis.

Stephen Hawking brings a lot of imagination and very little evidence of what he claims, questions and argues for things, and does not claim the words of famous people without looking at their point of view. Do this and you will understand me

Stiven Hodgkins

Stiven Hodgkins

If the creation of the universe is exactly what DG Kenstein says, shouldn't we have a center in the universe?

And based on that, if we make a 3D perimeter based on the fact that the center of the universe is the center of this orbit and the earth is the edge of that orbit, isn't it more likely to find life on other planets? ? ? Because that's so far from our planet and that's why I want to know if my logic is correct and why not.

?? ???

We are basically talking about an aspect that we have not yet explored.

Think about it: the universe is not three-dimensional but four-dimensional, and it persuades us to be three-dimensional.

There are no three-dimensional objects, just as there are no flat objects. In physics there is no surface without a body, thinking of surfaces is an abstract (mathematical geographical) concept, because the surface belongs to the body, there is no surface without bodies.

Therefore, there is no eternal body, the idea of ​​an eternal body is exactly the same as thinking of an airplane, like an airplane is a part of the body, a dimensional body, the size of which is equal to the dynamic (C) velocity. What we call time (relative) is a part of the body in four dimensions.

** From the beginning of the century, physics cannot be explained without four dimensions, and who made it or taught it to the ignorant.

The problem is that you think time is one dimension and the time we are talking about is the relative time of each viewer, which passes differently, this time the measure we measure. That is the speed of this direction (fourth dimension).

Therefore, we relate the fourth dimension to the relative time and speed of the wave dynamics.

You cannot describe the ratio of velocity, or time and axis to different observers, nor can you describe the energy or extent of the universe, the dimensional atomic concentration is Erich Eeztoria ...

Monthly Information: L.E.U.

You just have to be more discriminating with the help you render toward other people.

Stiven Hodgkins

Stiven Hodgkins

If the creation of the universe as dgkins stiven says, shouldn't we have a center in the universe? ۔

And based on that, if we make 3D frames based on the fact that the center of the universe is the center of this frame and the earth is the edge of that frame, then isn't it more likely to find life on other planets? ? ? Because they are as far apart as our planets and that's why I want to know if my logic is correct and why not.

update

We are basically talking about an aspect that we have not explored.

Think about it: the universe is not in three dimensions, but in four dimensions, and we are made for three dimensions.

There are no three-dimensional objects, just as there are no flat objects. In physics there is no surface without bodies, thinking of surfaces is an abstract (mathematical-geometric) concept, because surfaces belong to the body, there is no surface without bodies.

So there is no body without time, the thought of the body without time is completely abstract, like thinking about an airplane, just like an airplane is a part of the body, a three-dimensional body, the size of which is dynamic (c). Corresponding velocity, which we call time (relative), is part of the body in four dimensions.

Physics from the beginning of the century ** cannot be explained without four dimensions, and who made it or taught it to the ignorant.

The problem is that you understand that time is one dimension and the time we are talking about is relative time for each observer, which passes differently, this time the measure we measure is The speed of this dimension (fourth dimension).

Therefore, we relate the fourth dimension to the dynamics of the wave relative to the relative time and speed.

You can't tell different observers the combination of velocity, or time and axis, nor can you explain the energy or expansion of the universe.

More info: El Eio

You still have to learn to see that what you say has no meaning and no basis.

Stephen Hawking brings a lot of imagination and very little evidence that he claims, questions and thinks about things and argues for himself and does not claim the words of famous people without looking at their point of view, do so And you will understand me.

Stiven Hodgkins