Kinks In The Armor
What is the proper term in Armor or Armor? 3
I read about a guy on the ESPN website who found D saying that Jeremy Lin has one on his armor because he plays the ball too much. I think that's right because it's just an expression.
It depends on which side you are on.
There has been a record of people eating watermelon.
Or no one eats fried chicken.
Or where the image of some women in Congress is Obama's head in the image of a monkey.
I don't want to eat anyone
You can vote on your comments based on your situation.
In the case of Jeremy Lin, it can be said that Mr. Lin is Asian. And you can use the word in that context. You've never heard of Kobe or the look of armor you wear at the ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ dates back to ancient times when warriors wore royal armor. It would be a weakness in armor protection that a warning could be used to defeat it, or at least benefit the wearer.
Today it means the same thing, but now it means a weakness in strategy or skill that your opponent can use against you.
It could be a business, a game, a war, or a situation where someone is competing and facing a weakness which can mean the difference between winning or losing.
I thought you wrote it as a joke and you didn't mean it. There is nothing more to this statement than to admit that a player has a weakness that could endanger his team.
Armor cannot be as flexible as material, and can be twisted or pushed, such as in the morning, when you have to remove the corners of your back or comb your hair.
Armor is not such a material. If so, it will be too weak to serve its primary purpose as a strong shield between you and your opponent.
The only other thing in the coach was a small game. My wife and I could play alone in our bedroom after the kids were asleep.